Letters


Home Up In action! Letters MPH-Info MPH Speeches mph-resources MPH Rap

The MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY campaign has been a great success

but we must keep up the pressure to deliver.

Please write to Tony Blair or Peter Mandelson or lobby your MP or MEP.

Below are some ideas for letters which you could personalise. 

You can cut and paste from this web page or click to download a WORD file.

Tony Blair - Aid      WORD file

Tony Blair Debt      WORD file

Peter Mandelson Trade     WORD file

Peter Mandelson Short       WORD file

Peter Mandelson Dumping  WORD file

Peter Mandelson Liberalisation  WORD file

 

   Aid

Prime Minister Tony Blair

10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA

 

Dear Mr Blair,

 

I am writing to you following the G8 summit.  As you are aware MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY has become an unprecedented movement of passion, energy and solidarity.  However we are greatly disappointed that the G8 have chosen not to do all that campaigners insist is needed. 

 

Important steps have been taken and I would like to thank you for your hard work despite resistance more widely within the G8.  But more action is urgently needed if the G8 is to use its power to bring about real change for the world's poorest people.

Regarding
MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY’s call for more and better aid I am particularly concerned that the G8's promise of US$48 billion boost to aid in five years is mostly made up of money already pledged.  MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY calculates that only around US$20 billion is new money.

While overall this aid increase is a step forward, it is far from the historic deal that millions around the world have been demanding.  This aid will still arrive five years too late and falls far short of the scale of aid that is needed to end poverty in the world's poorest countries.  By 2010, we will still see the awful inequity whereby a child dies every 3.5 seconds, just because they are poor.


Regarding the quality of aid delivery I welcome the G8's recognition that poor countries should be free to decide their own economic policies. Please now turn these words into actions by putting an end to the damaging conditions that the World Bank and IMF push on impoverished countries.  The G8 must also improve the quality of their aid by untying it from donors' goods and services and ensuring that aid is focused on the poorest.  In these areas, the G8 have offered warm words, but little in terms of concrete commitments.

 

Without further changes in aid quantity and policy, the world will not see an end to poverty.  What we have asked for is action not words.  The governments of the G8 must now urgently take action together in all aid negotiations, including at the IMF and World Bank, to bring about more and better aid.  I urge the G8, and the UK as part of it, to go a lot further by taking the next upcoming opportunities and working with other world leaders at the UN summit on the Millennium Development Goals. 

 

The people of the world are already on the road to justice. They expect their leaders to be with them.  I am sad to say that the G8 communiqué has shown that they need to run much faster to catch up. 

 

I look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

   Debt

 

Prime Minister Tony Blair

10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA

 

Dear Mr Blair,

 

I am writing to you following the G8 summit.  As you are aware MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY has become an unprecedented movement of passion, energy and solidarity.  However we are greatly disappointed that the G8 have chosen not to do all that campaigners insist is needed. 

 

Important steps have been taken and I would like to thank you for your hard work despite resistance more widely within the G8.  But more action is urgently needed if the G8 is to use its power to bring about real change for the world's poorest people.

Regarding MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY’s call for the G8 to drop the debt I am concerned that the G8 leaders have simply endorsed the debt cancellation deal proposed by their Finance Ministers in June.  This deal was a small step forward but I urge the G8 leaders to go much further since it
only offers immediate full cancellation of outstanding debts to 18 poor countries.  I believe this is an inadequate response to the global debt crisis and more so because the deal fails to tackle the damaging conditions consistently attached to debt relief.

 

I welcome the fact that some countries' debts to some multilateral institutions have been cancelled in full for the first time as has long been called for.  I also welcome the inclusion of IMF debts in the deal which have been excluded for too long, and the positive language on measures to ensure that money stolen by corrupt former regimes is returned from banks in the North to poor countries.

 

However in too many areas on debt policy, the G8 have offered warm words, but little action.  In particular the proposal reinforces the damaging and undemocratic conditions attached to debt relief, which include forcing countries to privatise public utilities, liberalise trade, and cut spending on social services.  Further many indebted countries are excluded from the countries that will benefit and the deal still does not cover all debts.  For instance, debts to the Inter-American Development Bank, which are a huge burden on poor countries in South America, are not included.  Finally the proposal will provide less than $1 billion per year - the equivalent of less than one dollar per head per year for the people who will benefit - when more than $10 billion a year of debt cancellation is needed to contribute to the ending of extreme poverty.

 

Also I note with concern that despite these failings even this inadequate deal appears to be under threat as it still needs to be endorsed at meetings of the World Bank and IMF and recent leaked documents show that  European representatives at the IMF including those from Belgium, Switzerland, Holland and Norway are suggesting major modifications to the deal. That this could delay or even halt the debt cancellation promised and maintain an IMF stranglehold over developing country economies even after they qualify for debt cancellation is fundamentally unacceptable. 

 

Without further action to drop the debt, the world will not see an end to poverty.  What we have asked for is action not words.  The governments of the G8 must now urgently take action together in all debt negotiations, including at the IMF and World Bank, to see that rich countries drop the debt by increasing the quantity of debt cancelled in this deal, tackling the damaging conditions still attached, and ensuring that the deal is ratified and then delivered.  I urge the G8, and the UK as part of it, to go a lot further and secure real change by taking the next upcoming opportunities and working with other world leaders at the UN summit on the Millennium Development Goals. 

 

The people of the world are already on the road to justice. They expect their leaders to be with them.  I am sad to say that the G8 communiqué has shown that they need to run much faster to catch up. 

 

I look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

  Trade

 

The Rt Hon Peter Mandelson PC

EU Commissioner for Trade

Berlaymont office 09/24

200 rue de la Loi

Brussels

B-1040

 

Dear Mr Mandelson,

 

I am writing to you following the G8 summit.  As you are aware MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY has become an unprecedented movement of passion, energy and solidarity.  However we are greatly disappointed that the G8 have chosen not to do all that campaigners insist is needed. 

 

More action is urgently needed if rich nations are to use their power to bring about real change for the world's poorest people.  I am saddened that the G8 and the EU have not listened to or met the challenge of trade justice as clearly set out by MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY 

 

The Doha round was promised as a round to help developing countries, and the G8 have promised to work to make the Hong Kong negotiations a success.  But empty promises are costing lives!  I urge you to be part of changing this and to do all you can to ensure that the Doha round lives up to it name and promises and lifts millions out of poverty.

 

I am particularly concerned that in spite of the rhetoric of protecting developing economies, and though there is language in the G8 communiqué on letting African countries set their own trade policies, at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) rich nations continue to force open developing country markets.  Given the countless examples of liberalisation destroying markets, especially in agriculture, so vulnerable to dumping, surely it is time to give developing countries the freedom to set their own economic strategies and to protect their vulnerable livelihoods?

 

Please make sure that the EU doesn’t seek to impose liberalisation but actively supports and defends poor countries rights to protect their peoples.

 

I am also extremely disappointed about the G8’s decision not to set a date for ending the export subsidies that destroy the livelihoods of poor countries around the world.  None of the G8 countries would accept anyone dumping their excess production into their markets.  Why should the world’s poor bear the burden of export subsidies, and why does the WTO permit this?

 

I do not believe that there can be any morality or integrity in international politics, whilst such injustices are permitted.  There is much speculation that export subsidies may well be finally ended.  But not until 2010 or even later.  How can export subsidies be justified for a day longer when they cost such scandalous numbers of livelihoods and lives?  Please act to end the abomination of export subsidies, and show your leadership and courage by challenging other power blocks to join you.

 

I also deeply regret that the G8 and the EU have failed to call for effective regulation of multinational corporations operating in the world’s poorest countries. 

 

I therefore urge the EU to set an example to the other countries and enact legislation and support international initiatives to ensure that companies are held legally accountable for their social, environmental and economic impacts at home and abroad.  I call specifically for new laws to make reporting of the global social, human rights and environmental impact of companies mandatory; to make directors of companies who do not take all the necessary steps possible to limit the negative social and environmental impact of their businesses accountable for the damage they cause; and to allow communities to bring cases against companies in the home country, if justice fails them in the country in which an abuse took place.

 

By not regulating multinational companies, forcing free trade on poor countries and dumping agricultural products the G8 have chosen not to take the necessary decisions to make poverty history.  What we have asked for is action not words.  The governments of the G8 and the EU must now urgently take action together in all trade negotiations, especially at the World Trade Organisation but also through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to bring about trade justice, rather than being the obstacles to it as they are at present.  Specifically, please call for the end of export subsidies now, unilaterally if necessary; support the proposals of the G20 developing countries to meet their, priority, aspirations for the Doha round; enact legislation and support international initiatives to ensure that companies are held legally accountable for their social, environmental and economic impacts at home and abroad; and champion the special provisions needed by developing countries to protect their economies and the livelihoods of their peoples.

 

The Everything but Arms agreement shows that the European Commission can, when it is determined, demonstrate that it knows what is right and just and show world leadership.  The Commission must maintain its leadership.  I urge you to stand firm and insist that the Doha round is concluded quickly, with development as a priority, to bring an end to the tragic loss of so many lives because of unjust trade practices and policies.  A pro-poor agreement must be delivered! 

 

The people of the world are already on the road to justice. They expect their leaders to be with them.  I am sad to say that the G8 communiqué, and too much EU policy, has shown that they need to run much faster to catch up.

 

I look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Trade Short

 

The Rt Hon Peter Mandelson PC

EU Commissioner for Trade

Berlaymont office 09/24

200 rue de la Loi

Brussels

B-1040

 

Dear Mr Mandelson,

 

I am writing to you following the G8 summit.  As you are aware MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY has become an unprecedented movement of passion, energy and solidarity.  However we are greatly disappointed that the G8 have chosen not to do all that campaigners insist is needed. 

 

More action is urgently needed if rich nations are to use their power to bring about real change for the world's poorest people.  I am saddened that the G8 and the EU have not listened to or met the challenge of trade justice as clearly set out by MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY 

 

The Doha round was promised as a round to help developing countries, and the G8 have promised to work to make the Hong Kong negotiations a success.  But empty promises are costing lives!  I urge you to be part of changing this and to do all you can to ensure that the Doha round lives up to it name and promises and lifts millions out of poverty.

 

I am particularly concerned that in spite of the rhetoric of protecting developing economies, and though there is language in the G8 communiqué on letting African countries set their own trade policies, at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) rich nations continue to force open developing country markets.  Given the countless examples of liberalisation destroying markets, especially in agriculture, so vulnerable to dumping, surely it is time to give developing countries the freedom to set their own economic strategies and to protect their vulnerable livelihoods?

 

Please make sure that the EU doesn’t seek to impose liberalisation but actively supports and defends poor countries rights to protect their peoples.

 

Also the G8’s decision not to set a date for ending the export subsidies that destroy the livelihoods of poor countries around the world is extremely disappointing.  Further the failure to champion legislation to regulate the social and environmental impact of multinational corporations is another area of critical failure.

 

By not regulating multinational companies, forcing free trade on poor countries and dumping agricultural products the G8 have chosen not to take the necessary decisions to make poverty history.  What we have asked for is action not words.  The governments of the G8 and the EU must now urgently take action together in all trade negotiations, especially at the World Trade Organisation but also through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to bring about trade justice, rather than being the obstacles to it as they are at present.  Specifically, please call for the end of export subsidies now, unilaterally if necessary; support the proposals of the G20 developing countries to meet their, priority, aspirations for the Doha round; enact legislation and support international initiatives to ensure that companies are held legally accountable for their social, environmental and economic impacts at home and abroad; and champion the special provisions needed by developing countries to protect their economies and the livelihoods of their peoples.

 

The Everything but Arms agreement shows that the European Commission can, when it is determined, demonstrate that it knows what is right and just and show world leadership.  The Commission must maintain its leadership.  I urge you to stand firm and insist that the Doha round is concluded quickly, with development as a priority, to bring an end to the tragic loss of so many lives because of unjust trade practices and policies.  A pro-poor agreement must be delivered! 

 

The people of the world are already on the road to justice. They expect their leaders to be with them.  I am sad to say that the G8 communiqué, and too much EU policy, has shown that they need to run much faster to catch up.

 

I look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

  Trade Dumping

 

 

The Rt Hon Peter Mandelson PC

EU Commissioner for Trade

Berlaymont office 09/24

200 rue de la Loi

Brussels

B-1040

 

Dear Mr Mandelson,

 

I am writing to you following the G8 summit.  As you are aware MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY has become an unprecedented movement of passion, energy and solidarity.  However we are greatly disappointed that the G8 have chosen not to do all that campaigners insist is needed. 

 

More action is urgently needed if rich nations are to use their power to bring about real change for the world's poorest people.  I am saddened that the G8 and the EU have not listened to or met the challenge of trade justice as clearly set out by MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY 

 

I am particularly disappointed about the G8’s decision not to set a date for ending the export subsidies that destroy the livelihoods of poor countries around the world.  None of the G8 countries would accept anyone dumping their excess production into their markets.  Why should the world’s poor bear the burden of export subsidies, and why does the WTO permit this?

 

I do not believe that there can be any morality or integrity in international politics, whilst such injustices are permitted.  There is much speculation that export subsidies may well be finally ended.  But not until 2010 or even later.  How can export subsidies be justified for a day longer when they cost such scandalous numbers of livelihoods and lives?  Please act to end the abomination of export subsidies, and show your leadership and courage by challenging other power blocks to join you.

 

Also, though there is language in the communiqué on letting African countries set their own trade policies, at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) rich nations continue to force open developing country markets.   Further the failure to champion legislation to regulate the social and environmental impact of multinational corporations is another area of critical failure.

 

By not regulating multinational companies, forcing free trade on poor countries and dumping agricultural products the G8 have chosen not to take the necessary decisions to make poverty history.  What we have asked for is action not words.  The governments of the G8 and the EU must now urgently take action together in all trade negotiations, especially at the World Trade Organisation but also through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to bring about trade justice, rather than being the obstacles to it as they are at present.  Specifically, please call for the end of export subsidies now, unilaterally if necessary; support the proposals of the G20 developing countries to meet their, priority, aspirations for the Doha round; enact legislation and support international initiatives to ensure that companies are held legally accountable for their social, environmental and economic impacts at home and abroad; and champion the special provisions needed by developing countries to protect their economies and the livelihoods of their peoples.

 

The Everything but Arms agreement shows that the European Commission can, when it is determined, demonstrate that it knows what is right and just and show world leadership.  The Commission must maintain its leadership.  I urge you to stand firm and insist that the Doha round is concluded quickly, with development as a priority, to bring an end to the tragic loss of so many lives because of unjust trade practices and policies.  A pro-poor agreement must be delivered! 

 

The people of the world are already on the road to justice. They expect their leaders to be with them.  I am sad to say that the G8 communiqué, and too much EU policy, has shown that they need to run much faster to catch up.

 

I look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Trade Liberalisation

 

 

 

 

The Rt Hon Peter Mandelson PC

EU Commissioner for Trade

Berlaymont office 09/24

200 rue de la Loi

Brussels

B-1040

 

Dear Mr Mandelson,

 

I am writing to you following the G8 summit.  As you are aware MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY has become an unprecedented movement of passion, energy and solidarity.  However we are greatly disappointed that the G8 have chosen not to do all that campaigners insist is needed. 

 

More action is urgently needed if rich nations are to use their power to bring about real change for the world's poorest people.  I am saddened that the G8 and the EU have not listened to or met the challenge of trade justice as clearly set out by MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY 

 

The Doha round was promised as a round to help developing countries, and the G8 have promised to work to make the Hong Kong negotiations a success.  But empty promises are costing lives!  I urge you to be part of changing this and to do all you can to ensure that the Doha round lives up to it name and promises and lifts millions out of poverty.

 

I am particularly concerned that in spite of the rhetoric of protecting developing economies, and though there is language in the G8 communiqué on letting African countries set their own trade policies, at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) rich nations continue to force open developing country markets.  Given the countless examples of liberalisation destroying markets, especially in agriculture, so vulnerable to dumping, surely it is time to give developing countries the freedom to set their own economic strategies and to protect their vulnerable livelihoods?

 

Please make sure that the EU doesn’t seek to impose liberalisation but actively supports and defends poor countries rights to protect their peoples.

 

Also the G8’s decision not to set a date for ending the export subsidies that destroy the livelihoods of poor countries around the world is extremely disappointing.  Further the failure to champion legislation to regulate the social and environmental impact of multinational corporations is another area of critical failure.

 

By not regulating multinational companies, forcing free trade on poor countries and dumping agricultural products the G8 have chosen not to take the necessary decisions to make poverty history.  What we have asked for is action not words.  The governments of the G8 and the EU must now urgently take action together in all trade negotiations, especially at the World Trade Organisation but also through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to bring about trade justice, rather than being the obstacles to it as they are at present.  Specifically, please call for the end of export subsidies now, unilaterally if necessary; support the proposals of the G20 developing countries to meet their, priority, aspirations for the Doha round; enact legislation and support international initiatives to ensure that companies are held legally accountable for their social, environmental and economic impacts at home and abroad; and champion the special provisions needed by developing countries to protect their economies and the livelihoods of their peoples.

 

The Everything but Arms agreement shows that the European Commission can, when it is determined, demonstrate that it knows what is right and just and show world leadership.  The Commission must maintain its leadership.  I urge you to stand firm and insist that the Doha round is concluded quickly, with development as a priority, to bring an end to the tragic loss of so many lives because of unjust trade practices and policies.  A pro-poor agreement must be delivered! 

 

The people of the world are already on the road to justice. They expect their leaders to be with them.  I am sad to say that the G8 communiqué, and too much EU policy, has shown that they need to run much faster to catch up.

 

I look forward to your response.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

updated 07 April 2006